Monday, April 7, 2014

Wrote a text this morning about the unseemly that the press coverage, on average, has been paying t

If Matsunaga - so no, prosecutor Eluf! Remove that text, remove smiths clocks ... | Reinaldo Azevedo - Blog - VEJA.com
Search News Subscribe SEE SEE Brazil smiths clocks legend Science Economics Education Sports Health International Digital Life Infographics Themes Subscribe SEE CPI Waterfall Elections 2012 Case Bruno UFC The weight of taxes View All Photos and Videos Subscribe SEE Videos Photo Gallery Video Gallery Infographics Blogs and Columnists smiths clocks Subscribe SEE Reinaldo Azevedo Lauro Jardim Nunes Fernanda Furquim Ricardo Augusto Setti GPS All columnists
Wrote a text this morning about the unseemly that the press coverage, on average, has been paying to the case Matsunaga. The dead man is being treated as a villain; the villain - pardon the weirdness of calling villain who kills and dismembers - as a victim. I point out that text factors that explain this stupid approach.
Readers sent me an intervention that did Luiza Eluf on Facebook. Luiza is not an ordinary citizen, as we all are. Also of Justice prosecutor of the Public Ministry of the State of São Paulo. More than that. Represented Brazil at the World Conference on Women in 1995 in Beijing, organized by the UN. In 1990, he was part of the committee that submitted proposals to reform the Penal Code.
Attention! For most people, social networks, speak as "individuals", do not stop being who they are, especially when they opine on matters smiths clocks linked to your area of interest or to their profession. Yeah ... On the 8th, she lost a great chance to take an orange juice instead of writing this monumental nonsense, namely:
"The purpose of this new 'suitcase murder' which unfortunately occurred in SP, remember to husbands who do not want to die at the hands of the wife who should smiths clocks not buy firearms or take them home. The gun facilitates the crime, the weapon where there is great danger. And women lose self-control more easily. "
What can I say? There is the playful treatment of the subject ("new crime of mail"), the attribution of blame to the victim herself ("took the gun home") and the warning to "husbands" - as if such crimes were banal a result of merely a bad habit. More: there is the underlying thesis - that disagree, you know - according to which the existence of the weapon induces criminal action. I am among those who believe that a Bible in the wrong hands can be used to crush a skull.
Moreover, did not expect to read, no output from the pen of a historic women's advocate, the claim that weapons are especially dangerous in the hands of women because they "lose control more easily." Heeeiiinnn, prosecutor? How is it? You could say the same about, you know, the credit card? Or on ice cream bowls? Or on cars? If women are genetically less compatible than men with guns, it would be for them to create special limitations or have different laws when they kill? "You know, your honor, it was the hormones ..."
I do not want to demonize the prosecutor, no, and ask that you do not. But I invite Luiza Eluf to remove small text written with a bunch of nonsense. It was just a bad time, right, doc? By Reinaldo Azevedo
Approve smiths clocks comments that readers express their opinions. Comments containing vulgar words and profanity, insults, personal data (email, phone, ID, etc.) And external links, or are unintelligible, will be deleted. Errors Portuguese not prevent the publication of a review. Know the rules for approving comments on the site SEE
in my opinion, smiths clocks nothing justifies this crime, for having guns in the house not right in her or anyone else take life, she did does not, she killed beheaded, quartered, I can not imagine me doing it all alone with the man that I once loved, I would rather die beside him, because smiths clocks I'd be dead already left the moment I practiced on this monstrosity, we are rational human beings, our lives are as a company depends on each learn to manage, not also agree with Luiza Eluf no justification will not reverse the roles he was a victim, she's executioner.
Ie, sr. Marcos Andrade (6/18/2012 - 2:08), smiths clocks the Lord is, YES, justifying the criminal, doing exactly the same trick of reversing the onus of the crime ("You paid to see ..."). Comments narrow-minded as the Lord and the prosecutor reveal the idiocy that prevails in this country, that gets to the point of putting the best face of a cold and calculating killer (contrary to what the prosecutor fold) while the other side tries to discredit the most of your (real) victim smiths clocks (cf. "suitcase without a handle of those" etc..). With which

No comments:

Post a Comment